| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. CCP MASIVE FAIL - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bugsy VanHalen wrote: Deen Wispa wrote: This isn't an exploit. While I disagree with BM on many things, they are using the game mechanics to their advantage. Much like how pirates use the Orca mechanic to gatecamp and GTFO when overwhelmed. ...
- by Rail Gun - at 2012.10.29 15:26:00
|
2. CCP MASIVE FAIL - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
OsirisShi wrote: THIS IS THE F****** GREAT PROBLEM. You are right, this is just great
- by Rail Gun - at 2012.10.26 17:28:00
|
3. CCP MASIVE FAIL - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Antares 04 wrote: And with this, I'm almost completely sure your trolling for the sake of it, as opposed to be as persistently ignorant as you appear. I could spend another 20 minutes of my rapidly diminishing available time to try, again, to ...
- by Rail Gun - at 2012.10.26 16:40:00
|
4. CCP MASIVE FAIL - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Antares 04 wrote: You are intentionally ignoring the bigger issue here. EVE may not be fair, but it is a game. One people pay for. To be entertained. There is an exit in place for most situations, so that even if things don't work out, even if ...
- by Rail Gun - at 2012.10.26 09:39:00
|
5. CCP MASIVE FAIL - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alice Krysta wrote: It's called exploit but CCP will only involve in this if a member of their friends alliances or any of their friends are petitioning this ... cause they don't give a crap about old corp or old players .... don't u see ?...
- by Rail Gun - at 2012.10.26 08:51:00
|
6. CCP MASIVE FAIL - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yuri Intaki wrote: Val Erian wrote: You should contact Bad Messenger he's usualy online.:) I'm sure he'll discuss terms with you. You probaly wont like them tho. Price has apparently been set so perhaps there will be progress. At least t...
- by Rail Gun - at 2012.10.26 08:02:00
|
7. CCP MASIVE FAIL - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Antares 04 wrote: If that's the case Damar, you may want to tell them why you won't accept their surrender request and let them be on their way? It's pretty clear they don't want to be locked down in an eternal war when they might instead join ...
- by Rail Gun - at 2012.10.26 07:32:00
|
8. CCP MASIVE FAIL - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
[quote=Antares 04...The answer is, that it's NOT fair... ...Because despite what you seem to think, this BS is not fair...[/quote] Eve is not fair. They still have option to remake their corp with same name (like CCP already told them). THEY HAVE...
- by Rail Gun - at 2012.10.26 07:22:00
|
9. CCP MASIVE FAIL - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tekitha wrote: if you truly believe that ccp's objective is to force people to never wardec anyone for fear of having to disband their "10yr old" (older than both of us combined and infact, almost as old as eve itself) corporation, then you goo...
- by Rail Gun - at 2012.10.26 05:22:00
|
10. CCP MASIVE FAIL - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tekitha wrote: yes, because CCP and their all knowing wisdom have never (by their own admission) gotten something wrong ... you clearly havn't been here very long. If that is your main, I have been here littlebit longer than you. I'm not the...
- by Rail Gun - at 2012.10.26 03:57:00
|
11. CCP MASIVE FAIL - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tekitha wrote: Rail Gun wrote: It's not my opinion, it's how this game works now. And I must say again that I like what I see in this thread. An exceptionally well delivered argument, very conducive to a discussion about a clearly flawed...
- by Rail Gun - at 2012.10.26 03:04:00
|
12. CCP MASIVE FAIL - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tekitha wrote: I intentionally steered clear of the word exploit since from the CCP responses I have seen on the subject from various people, it seems its working as they want it to, hence it's not technically an "exploit" It is however a clea...
- by Rail Gun - at 2012.10.26 02:40:00
|
13. CCP MASIVE FAIL - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tekitha wrote: Rail Gun wrote: So you want that aggressor must have right to retract from war if they want (doesent have to agree on mutual war), but defender must stay in war as long as aggressor wants? Your alliance wardecked 10 man corp b...
- by Rail Gun - at 2012.10.26 02:10:00
|
14. CCP MASIVE FAIL - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
OsirisShi wrote: DDbreaker wrote: well this guys are taking advantage of this from 2009, and CCP just acting like nothing is happening. I just found a post about something similar like this, where they are listed with their alts: " FW troubl...
- by Rail Gun - at 2012.10.26 01:29:00
|
15. CCP MASIVE FAIL - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I like what I see here... it amazes me how people are so eager to use word "exploit" about every game mechanic that they dont approve. I can only imagine all the tears new aggro mechanics will cause when people start to "exploit" them and first pe...
- by Rail Gun - at 2012.10.26 00:54:00
|
16. Latest Monocle PR move - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I should turn off bs-filter from my monocle, I can't see OP
- by Rail Gun - at 2011.06.29 10:17:00
|
17. List of Monocle owners - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Almost all of the Monocle Overlords CEO's have monocle (only our slavecorps are poor). So you can ad me, Baron von Thulium, Tosi, uhox, Jasdemi and Zheng Guo on your list of fine gentlemen.
- by Rail Gun - at 2011.06.28 09:56:00
|
18. Is CCP illegally not allowing people to unsub? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Problem is not that unsubscribing is too hard, the real problem is that subscribing is too easy. Threads like these have proven it in last few days.
- by Rail Gun - at 2011.06.28 09:41:00
|
19. Introducing: MONOCLEGEDDON - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This hunt is pointless if none of the Monocle Overlords are not on the list.
- by Rail Gun - at 2011.06.27 19:30:00
|
20. Introducing: MONOCLEGEDDON - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
On a behalf of Monocle Overlords I say this is a splendid idea.
- by Rail Gun - at 2011.06.27 16:03:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |